tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6246003255618765456.post378932837058570691..comments2011-07-29T22:38:08.732-07:00Beckyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09774817532857016570noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6246003255618765456.post-28399036540591874452011-07-29T22:38:08.732-07:002011-07-29T22:38:08.732-07:00Argue all you want, it should be &quot;photos&quot;. And I suspect some of these horrors are the work of http://www.njdiningguide.com<br />- they are the ones listed as the ones who design and maintain the site. The owners of the restaurant are just as illiterate or they would raise hell about it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6246003255618765456.post-63610891619502695422009-03-05T11:10:00.000-08:002009-03-05T11:10:00.000-08:00I say photo' and photo's, which is quite correct. (:Danielhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03705842750144906555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6246003255618765456.post-50585140600386858552009-02-22T14:40:00.000-08:002009-02-22T14:40:00.000-08:00Perhaps, but I doubt that was the intention here.Beckyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09774817532857016570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6246003255618765456.post-58442669550749818542009-02-22T03:39:00.000-08:002009-02-22T03:39:00.000-08:00Can't the word photo's be considered as the use of an apostrophe to show the omission of letters in the word photographs?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com